HCCHCC
Governance & management

Decisions that hold up
to scrutiny.

HCC's credibility rests on a clear separation between who audits a facility and who decides on its certificate. A Shariah board, a technical committee, and an impartiality function keep each role independent — and every step on the record.

Reception area at HCC's Brooklyn office
How HCC is structured

Three roles, kept deliberately apart.

Religious authority, technical authority, and the safeguard of impartiality sit in separate hands. No single role can shortcut the others.
Religious authority

Shariah board

A standing board of qualified scholars sets and interprets the Halal rulings that underpin every HCC scheme. The board approves scheme criteria, rules on questions of ingredient and process permissibility, and signs off the Shariah review that precedes any certification decision.
Technical authority

Technical & certification committee

A technical committee owns the audit methodology, auditor competence criteria, and scheme documentation across food, pharma, cosmetics, and chemicals. It maintains the document templates and re-audit cadence, and reviews audit findings before they reach a decision.
Independence

Impartiality oversight

An impartiality function safeguards the certification process from commercial, financial, and personal pressure. It reviews conflict-of-interest declarations, monitors risks to objectivity, and has the standing to halt or unwind a decision where impartiality is threatened.
The organisation

How the work is divided.

HCC is organised so that assurance, operations, and independent oversight never collapse into one office. The audit and the certification decision sit in different hands, and an independent governance arm handles impartiality, complaints, and monitoring.

HCC

Halal Conformity Center

Executive Leadership

Sets direction · holds the divisions below

Divisions under Executive Leadership
  • Strategy & International Affairs

    Direction · partner network · recognition

  • Governance & Oversight

    Impartiality · Complaints · Monitoring

    • Impartiality Committee

      Conflict screening

    • Complaints & Appeals

      Independent handling

    • Monitoring & KPIs

      Surveillance metrics

  • Halal Assurance & Conformity

    Auditing · Quality · Certification decision

    • Quality & Compliance

      Technical assessment — ingredient & process review

    • Audit & Inspection

      Lead-auditor network — risk-based planning

    • Shariah Supervisory Board

      Independent scholarly panel — Shariah opinions

    • Certification Decision

      Decision & issuance — independent review of audit

  • Operations & Finance

    Applications · Logistics · Billing

    • Applications Desk

      Intake & support

    • Scheduling & Logistics

      Audit planning

    • Administrative Services

      HR · Vendors · Records & privacy

    • Finance & Billing

      Proposals · Contracts · Invoices

  • Client Success

    Onboarding · Scheduling · Renewals

    • Onboarding

      New-client setup

    • Scheduling

      Audit & renewal calendar

    • Renewals

      Annual surveillance & renewal

  • Client Enablement & Innovation

    Digital tools, verification & knowledge center

  • Certification Committee

    Evaluation · Decision · Integrity · Compliance · Oversight

Independent oversight & decisionDivisionOperational functionRoles and functions only — HCC does not publish individual names.
The certification decision

Auditing and deciding are separate jobs.

The person who walks the floor is not the person who grants the certificate. That separation is the core control behind every HCC decision — it keeps a relationship with a client from coloring the outcome.

  • The auditor who inspects a facility does not make the certification decision.
  • Shariah review and technical review are completed before a decision is taken.
  • A separate certification reviewer confirms the file is complete and consistent.
  • The final grant, refusal, suspension, or withdrawal is made by a decision-maker not involved in the audit.
Appeals & complaints

Anyone can challenge a decision.

A trustworthy certificate has to be contestable. HCC runs a defined appeals and complaints process so that decisions can be reviewed — by people who were not part of making them.

01

Complaint or appeal received

A client, buyer, or member of the public can raise a complaint about a certificate, or a certified client can appeal a decision. Every submission is logged and acknowledged.

02

Independent review

The matter is reviewed by personnel not involved in the original decision. Where a Shariah or technical question is at issue, the relevant board or committee is consulted.

03

Resolution & record

A reasoned outcome is communicated to the complainant or appellant, and any corrective action — including changes to a certificate on the registry — is recorded.

Document control

Every scheme, version-controlled.

Scheme criteria, audit checklists, and decision records are controlled documents. Changes are versioned and approved by the relevant committee, so an audit always runs against the current, authorized criteria — and a past decision can be traced to the rules in force at the time.

  • Scheme criteria and checklists carry a version and an approval owner.
  • Audit files, review notes, and decision records are retained and traceable.
  • Each certificate on the public registry maps back to the criteria it was issued against.
  • Superseded versions are archived rather than discarded, preserving the decision trail.
Now booking 2026 audits

Questions about how we decide?

Whether you're a buyer checking a certificate or a manufacturer preparing for audit, a certification advisor can walk you through the governance behind an HCC decision.